This will be the last item I will post on the general
subject of islands. I have written
about my personal history with a particular island, biblical islands, liturgical
islands, literary islands, and now the island that gave birth to the hybrid
version of Christianity that has nurtured me, confused me, annoyed me, intrigued
me, and employed me for the past fifty plus years.
As unlikely a church as it is, I cannot imagine myself as
anything but an Anglican. Maybe that’s because of my history with islands. I am
not familiar with any major branch of Christianity other than Anglicanism that
is so closely identified with the life and history of an island. In terms of
global faith traditions, only Japan has a similar connection to Shintoism.
So forget the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral! Forget the
Archbishop of Canterbury and the Anglican Consultative Council! Most of all,
forget the misbegotten and hopefully forgotten “Windsor Covenant”! Anglican
identity is not theological, ecclesiological, or any-sort-of-logical… our
identity is that of islanders.
Shakespeare, in Richard the Second, has one of his
characters pronounce this well-known invocation of English exceptionalism:
Against the envy of
less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England…
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England…
OK, Shakespeare was laying it on a bit thick in that
passage, but it does call attention to the unique role geography has played in
Britain’s development. Along with everything else British, Anglicanism evolved
in a setting just isolated enough from its continental neighbors to permit
unique forms to flourish, but not so isolated as to result in something utterly
disconnected.
In other words a Via
Media…balanced, nuanced, holistic. Or, depending on how you look at it,
chaotic, conflicted, and confused.
When asked his opinion on the essence of Anglicanism, Abba
Jonathan said: “ Essence? On the wrong side they drive.”
No comments:
Post a Comment