Matthew
22:34-46
NARRATOR: When the Pharisees heard that Jesus had silenced the
Sadducees, they gathered together, and one of them, a lawyer, asked him a
question to test him.
PHARISEE: "Teacher, which
commandment in the law is the greatest?"
NARRATOR: He said to him,
JESUS: "`You shall love the
Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your
mind.' This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it:
`You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments hang all
the law and the prophets."
NARRATOR: Now while the Pharisees
were gathered together, Jesus asked them this question: Jesus: "What do
you think of the Messiah? Whose son is he?"
Narrator: They said to him,
Pharisee: "The son of David."
Narrator: He said to them,
Jesus: "How is it then that
David by the Spirit calls him Lord, saying,
`The Lord said to my Lord,
"Sit at my right hand,
until I put your enemies under your
feet"'?
If David thus calls him Lord, how
can he be his son?"
Narrator: No one was able to give
him an answer, nor from that day did anyone dare to ask him any more questions.
BACKGROUND
NOT A PARABLE… rather a “dispute
story”, of which there are many in the gospels.
NOT AN ORIGINAL TEACHING…Jesus
simply quotes the Book of Deuteronomy. The Pharisees undoubtedly believed the
same thing.
In Luke’s version of this story, the questioner presses
Jesus to define what he means by “neighbor.” Jesus answers by telling the
Parable of the Good Samaritan.
C.S. Lewis wrote The
Four Loves, in which he pointed out that the English word “love” is used to
translate four different Greek words used in the New Testament. These are
Storge= “affection”
Philia= “friendship”
Eros= “romance”
Agape= self-giving,
unconditional, God-like love…love that is inhabited more than felt.
Guess which word is used in this passage?
JESUS CONFRONTS THE PHARISEES with his own question…
THE IDEA OF MESSIAHSHIP grew in importance in proportion to
Israel’s misfortune as a nation-state. The destruction of the Jewish State in
586 B.C. made the tradition of a divinely-ordained Davidic monarchy seem
impractical… and, in Jesus’ day, the
succession of unsavory politicians who ruled parts of Palestine as proxies for
the Romans made that tradition even more far-fetched. The hopes of Israel were
fulfillable only by means of a drastic intervention into history by God. The
“Son of David” Messiah was to restore the ancient kingdom with the assistance
of angelic armies and dramatic demonstrations of divine power.
Jesus repudiates this version of
Messiahship by quoting Psalm 110:1: “The LORD [i.e. The God of Israel] said to
my Lord [the Davidic king of Judea in the psalmist’s time], ‘sit at my right
hand, * until I make your enemies your footstool.” Jesus, (presuming along with
others that David was the actual author of the psalms…which no serious
contemporary scholar accepts) makes a play on Hebrew words to confuse the
Pharisees and subvert the concept of a military messiah.
Psalm 110, if one reads on to
verse 6, relishes the idea that “[The Messianic King]…will heap high the
corpses; * he will smash heads over the wide earth.”
This is not what Christians have
meant by proclaiming Jesus as Messiah/Christ, although there have been, and
still are, voices ascribing to this view.
SUMMARY
“Driven by the forces of love, the fragments of the world
seek each other so that the world may come into being.”
― Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
― Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
“To be grateful is to recognize the Love of God in
everything He has given us - and He has given us everything.
Thomas Merton
“Love is all you need.”
The Beatles
The notion of a Davidic Messiah dies hard, even in
Christianity. The Puritans in new world thought they were establishing a “new
and purified Israel;” colonial powers justified their rule by forcing native
people to become Christian and save their eternal souls; Mormons established
their settlements in Utah as a new manifestation of the kingdom of God. Can people be coerced into the kingdom of
God?
Perhaps Jesus fulfills the expectation of a Davidic Messiah in an unexpected way, by manifesting aspects of David’s life that do not reflect the “Head Smasher” image.
Perhaps Jesus fulfills the expectation of a Davidic Messiah in an unexpected way, by manifesting aspects of David’s life that do not reflect the “Head Smasher” image.
In 2 Samuel
16, we read how King David was betrayed and temporarily replaced by his beloved
son Absalom. In this passage King David is less of a Conquering Hero and more
like a Suffering Servant. “So David and his men went on the road, while Shimei went along on the hillside opposite him and
cursed as he
went, throwing stones and flinging dust at him.” Is not this evocative of
the passion of Christ?
No comments:
Post a Comment