Friday, July 19, 2013

Since the New York Times did not publish it, here is the letter I sent them which begins...




...Presiding Bishop Katherine Jefferts Schori gets a bum rap from Mark Oppenheimer in “For Episcopal Church’s Leader, a Sermon Leads to More Dissent”, on June 22, who quotes a Baylor University scholar as saying “she interprets the text in a direction the author (of  Acts) would not recognize.”


 Well duh! Would any of the Old Testament authors have recognized the way their words were interpreted by the Christians? Acts says nothing whatsoever about the fate of the fortune-telling slave girl exorcised by Paul, except that she had been deprived of her livelihood. Oppenheimer’s scholar generously ascribes to Paul the role of the girl’s “liberator”, which might be justified if the apostolic author had shown any interest  whatsoever in her fate.
As it is, it is up to Jesus and the Presiding Bishop to show concern for those considered unworthy of notice by religious authorities in their respective times. 



No comments: