1.
Not a “question” so much as an observation: one
person found it easier to understand the dissension among Joseph’s many
brothers when she remembered that their father Jacob begat some of them by his
wife Leah, some by his wife Rachel, and others of them by their respective
maids. Sort of like an episode of “Sister Wives,”right? Jacob’s favoritism
toward wife Rachel and her sons (Joseph and Benjamin), combined with Joseph’s
spoiled-brat mentality, set the stage for the “Joseph Saga” to unfold. No
wonder they couldn’t seem to get along.
2.
Another person pointed out that the attribution
of super-long lifetimes to such figures as Abraham (175 years), and Sarah (127
years), makes the Genesis stories
seem incredibly far-fetched. I agree, but don’t think such folk-tale
elaborations are essential to the basic truths revealed in these ancient
stories. These traditions were passed on by word of mouth for many generations
before anyone thought to write them down, and they cannot be regarded as
“historical” in the same way as we think of history, that is, as an “objective”
account of events. My analogy for this comes from my youth, when I went many
times to Deer Camp with my grandfather and his old-fashioned brothers and
nephews. Every year they told and retold the same hunting stories, and each
time there would be variations in detail, but not in terms of what the stories
were supposed to mean. The prehistoric
stories in Genesis contain many
inaccuracies in detail, but the core
message is consistent: the God of
Abraham and Sarah can be trusted to fulfill the divine promise of blessing.
I know this central Biblical theme to bed
true, because we ( who are among their spiritual descendants) are still being
reliably blessed after these thousands of years. When in Genesis 12:3, God tells Abraham “in you all the families of the
earth shall be blessed,” it was you and I that God had in mind. I trust that
promise and that blessing with all my being, and that trust has nothing to do
with how old Abraham was when he died. On the other hand, I can never regard these
stories as purely imaginary inventions, like “Paul Bunyon”, or “Lord of the
Rings.” How do I know that? Because I have been to Deer Camp, and I know the
difference between a tall tale and a hunting story. How’s that for a scholarly observation?
One last observation: the “Joseph Saga” is a fairly down-to-earth
narrative, with the supernatural element limited to dream-interpretation and a sense of
a divine purpose working itself out through ordinary events. Joseph and his
brothers come across as if they could be guests on a “Dr. Phil” episode, or
some of my Great-Uncles at a Pennsylvania Deer Camp. What’s more, when Joseph
died he was a mere 110 years old! (Genesis
50:26). A spring chicken! As the narrative moves forward in time, the Biblical
authors seem to moderate their estimation of patriarchal lifetimes. For me,
that constitutes a welcome development, since the Bible’s authority proceeds as
much from its earthy human-ness as it
does from its unprecedented surprises.
We will encounter plenty of both as
we read on. I look forward to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment